William de BRAOSE
SOURCES: 1. The Plantagenet Ancestry, Eng. 116, p. 78 2. The Complete Peerage, G.E.C., Eng. v, v. 1, p. 21, 22, v. 4, p. 193, 194,v. 6, p. 451-54 3. The Genealogist, Eng. Pub. AF, os, v. 4, p. 139-41, 235 4. Arch. Cambr., Wales Pub. A, 4s, v. 14, p. 177, 6s, v. 10, p. 340 5. Burke's Extinct Peerage, 1883 & 1886, Eng. P-1, p. 72 6. Dict. of Nat'l Biog., Eng. Pub. A, v. 6, p. 229-31 7. Dugdale's Baronage of Engl, Eng. AL, v. 1, p. 414, 416 8. Wells & Allied Families, B8G4, p. 177 9. Sussex Arch. Collections, Suss. 1, v. 5, p. 5, 148 10. The Ligon Family, B15A183, v. 1, p. 108 RESEARCH NOTES: There is no indication in any of the above quoted sources that there was aGiles or Roger belonging to this family. Also there is some doubt whether the above Reginald has been mistaken for the Reginald who married Grace de Briwere whois actually grandson of the above couple. In the case of child #1, Bertha, thereis also some quandry as to whether she belongs to this couple or to William, child #2, and whether she married William Beauchamp or Walter de Beauchamp. Thereare also some indications that this Bertha is the daughter of the above couplewho married Adam de Port. Because of the sealing action previously taken, theirnames will be left on this compilation until better evidence is made available. SOURCES: 1. The Plantagenet Ancestry, Eng. 116, p. 78 2. The Complete Peerage, G.E.C., Eng. v, v. 1, p. 21, 22, v. 4, p. 193, 194,v. 6, p. 451-54 3. The Genealogist, Eng. Pub. AF, os, v. 4, p. 139-41, 235 4. Arch. Cambr., Wales Pub. A, 4s, v. 14, p. 177, 6s, v. 10, p. 340 5. Burke's Extinct Peerage, 1883 & 1886, Eng. P-1, p. 72 6. Dict. of Nat'l Biog., Eng. Pub. A, v. 6, p. 229-31 7. Dugdale's Baronage of Engl, Eng. AL, v. 1, p. 414, 416 8. Wells & Allied Families, B8G4, p. 177 9. Sussex Arch. Collections, Suss. 1, v. 5, p. 5, 148 10. The Ligon Family, B15A183, v. 1, p. 108 RESEARCH NOTES: There is no indication in any of the above quoted sources that there was a Giles or Roger belonging to this family. Also there is some doubt whether the above Reginald has been mistaken for the Reginald who married Grace de Briwere whois actually grandson of the above couple. In the case of child #1, Bertha, thereis also some quandry as to whether she belongs to this couple or to William, child #2, and whether she married William Beauchamp or Walter de Beauchamp. Thereare also some indications that this Bertha is the daughter of the above couplewho married Adam de Port. Because of the sealing action previously taken, theirnames will be left on this compilation until better evidence is made available.
SOURCES: 1. The Genealogist, Eng. Pub. AF, os, v. 4, p. 139, 235-244, v. 5, p. 65-70,147 2. Sussex Arch. Collect. Sussex 1, v. 5, p. 148-53 3. The Complete Peerage, G.E.C., Eng. V, v. 1, p. 22, v. 7, p. 535, 536, v.9, p. 275 4. Burke's Extinct Peerage, Arch. Cambr., Wales Pub. A, 4s, v. 14, p. 176-80, 6s, v. 10, p. 340-43 5. Wells & Allied Families, B8G4, p. 177-78 6. Dict. of Nat'l Biog., Eng. Pub. A, v. 6, p. 229-31 RESEARCH NOTES: The above child #8, John, adopted the surname Knill, which name his descendants are known by. The temple work done under the heirship of Robert Wimmer in1939 claims as children for this couple--Flandrina, Roger, Philip, Thomas, Walter, Henry and Bernard; however, none of the above sources justify such childrenbelinging to this group. SOURCES: 1. The Genealogist, Eng. Pub. AF, os, v. 4, p. 139, 235-244, v. 5, p. 65-70,147 2. Sussex Arch. Collect. Sussex 1, v. 5, p. 148-53 3. The Complete Peerage, G.E.C., Eng. V, v. 1, p. 22, v. 7, p. 535, 536, v.9, p. 275 4. Burke's Extinct Peerage, Arch. Cambr., Wales Pub. A, 4s, v. 14, p. 176-80, 6s, v. 10, p. 340-43 5. Wells & Allied Families, B8G4, p. 177-78 6. Dict. of Nat'l Biog., Eng. Pub. A, v. 6, p. 229-31 RESEARCH NOTES: The above child #8, John, adopted the surname Knill, which name his descendants are known by. The temple work done under the heirship of Robert Wimmer in 1939 claims as children for this couple--Flandrina, Roger, Philip, Thomas, Walter, Henry and Bernard; however, none of the above sources justify such children belinging to this group.
Invalid baptism temple code: LLKK.
He married Bertha de Gloucester Abt 1150 at of Herefordshire, England . Bertha de Gloucester was born at Gloucester, Gloucester, England Abt 1130 daughter of Miles Fitz Walter and Sibyl de Neufmarche .
They were the parents of 12
children:
Bertha de Braose
born Abt 1151.
William de Braose
born Abt 1153.
Reginald de Braose
born Abt 1155.
Sybil de Braose
born Abt 1140.
Roger de Braose
born Abt 1159.
Giles de Braose
born Abt 1163.
Blocked
Blocked
Isabel de Braose
born Abt 1154.
Engeram de Braose
born Cal 1154.
Blocked
Blocked
William de Braose died Abt 1192 at of England .